Similaar Foto tutorials
English
- Espaņol
Equipment
recommendations
Flaat
Picture Styles
Lens tests
Sharpness
- Bokeh

2017 Tom Antos DR test

 
HOME
 


 
Foto tutorial (English)
Foto tutorial (Espaņol)
 


 
Equipment recommendations US-ES
 


 
Flaat for Canon
Flaat for Nikon
Flaat for the BMC
Flaat for NEX-5N
Old Picture Style Tests
 


 
LENS TESTS
a7s stills
a7s video
550D stills
550D video
550D video lineskip
5D2 stills
5D2 video

Conclusions
APS-C vs Full Frame
ND filters
Other filters


BOKEH TESTS
Summary
Alternative scenarios
 


 
Badly assembled lenses and image quality
Lens mount compatibility chart
ISO on different cameras
High ISO on the 5D3
DIY: DR test chart
RGBWK Bayer sensors


DoF/FoV CALCULATOR
Notes on DoF-FoV
Notes on crop-DoF-FoV


Custom Cropmarks for Magic Lantern on the Canon 550D


How many megapixels do I want?
How many megapixels can I see?


Quick Monitor Calibration Chart


MY VIDEOS


Random rants


Search engine



I'm not having time to do any shootouts lately, but luckily other people are running very nice tests. This one by Tom Antos is so interesting I decided to post about it. Watch it in full here.

I prefer the tests where you shoot a regular scene and then start overexposing and underexposing until some parts of the image break down, because these chart tests don't account for noise very well and can overstate the usable DR by several stops. Also, the bias is bigger on compressed video than on uncompressed RAW, which skews the results. But this one is still very well done and the results are interesting, and match well my 2014 shootout. In particular, he finds a 2.5-stops advantage for the a6300 with slog2 with respect to the GH4 with CineLikeD, where my test said it was three. Close enough.

I'm reading his images on my own, and not relying on his waveform measurements. We seem to have different criteria for deciding what counts and what doesn't. Go watch the video if you want to reach your own conclusions.

So, this is what I see (scroll down to see a full-res version of this chart):



Also, adding to this the results from Cinema5D, here and here, and starting from the assumption that the a6300 and the a7S II have exactly the same dynamic range (as I believe is the case), then the FS7 has one stop better DR than the a6300/a7SII (so it's tied with the BM 4.6k, and slightly ahead of the C300II, which is not that much better than the a7S II in terms of DR), and the Alexa has another stop more than that.





please visit my equipment recommendations















Copyright Similaar 2011 -- similaar.feedback@gmail.com -- @Similaar
Similaar is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program and the Amazon EU Associates Programme, two affiliate advertising programs designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and amazon.es.